In reading the article by Patrick Tsai entitled, “The Sandpiper pipeline: Enbridge profits and the destruction of local farms and livelihoods”, it is evident that the transportation of crude oil can affect all of us. This article addresses a growing concern, which is how these pipelines have leaks and then pollute the land around it. Specifically, if Enbridge does build the sandpiper pipeline, farms and land across North Dakota and Minnesota will have the potential risk of eventually being contaminated by a leak. The picture shows the plans for where Enbridge might place the pipeline.
This article, however, states that local
resident have taken steps in opposing Enbridge through organizing a group
called the Carlton County Land Stewards. According to the article, Enbridge
focuses on the job opportunities related to the new pipeline, but the Carlton
County Land Stewards oppose this through looking at how the pipeline will
affect the land.
ANALYSIS
Understandably, it is important to analyze an article like this, because it is important for readers to know if it is a biased representation, just the facts, or someone’s logical conclusions. The three areas to look at are ethos, pathos, and logos, and they are how the author tries to persuade you in to thinking one way or the other about an issue. Either the article will have credible facts (ethos), logical conclusions (logos), appeal to the reader’s emotions (pathos), or a combination of these. If you would like more information about ethos, pathos, and logos, follow this link: http://pathosethoslogos.com/
ANALYSIS
Understandably, it is important to analyze an article like this, because it is important for readers to know if it is a biased representation, just the facts, or someone’s logical conclusions. The three areas to look at are ethos, pathos, and logos, and they are how the author tries to persuade you in to thinking one way or the other about an issue. Either the article will have credible facts (ethos), logical conclusions (logos), appeal to the reader’s emotions (pathos), or a combination of these. If you would like more information about ethos, pathos, and logos, follow this link: http://pathosethoslogos.com/


As far as the use of ethos is concerned, the
author, Patrick Tsai, is credible in the fact that he writes for the Institute
and Agriculture Trade Policy organization and has a degree in biology. This
fact, however, just proves that he would be biased in writing an article that
supports land preservation. He provides a few credible examples, such as
stating that over 300 oil spills have gone unreported in the past two years,
but these examples always agree with his bias. Because of this, the article’s
persuasive elements are largely based on pathos, not logos or ethos.
REFLECTIONWhile reading, I thought of multiple questions about the pipeline including:
·
Is there a
better way for Enbridge to transport the oil?
·
Is the
railroad any safer since many spills occur through this transportation already?
·
In today’s
economy, shouldn’t an opportunity for more jobs be considered a positive thing?
I am not saying that I think the residents
are wrong or that Enbridge is wrong either. My argument for this article is
that it only addresses one side of the issue, so instead of getting caught up
with one side, I want to understand more about why the pipeline is a good
project to go forward with.
When it comes to this particular article,
readers will be interested in the possibility for oil spills with this pipeline,
because this pollution ultimately affects the crops and therefore the food quality
and prices we pay on those goods. Readers can also think about considering the
possible economic growth through projects like this. If you would like to read
more articles about the sandpiper pipeline, use the following links:
No comments:
Post a Comment